|
By Oded Agam, Director of Technical Services, RADCOM.
This article appeared in Telecom Business magazine, December
1998 and all rights belong to Telecom Business.
Introduction
WDM and ATM are getting married. And it's
not because of love - it's because of bandwidth. As more
and more applications are using voice and video together
with an increasing amount of data there is just not enough
bandwidth to go around. Bandwidth needs for the Internet
are doubling every year. The problem is particularly big
at the backbone. Telcos are faced with huge investments in
order to fulfil the capacity demands. Alongside, they are
requested to provide increased Quality of Service, and provision
for various classes of service to meet the strict demands
of voice, video and still deal with the huge amount of data
on their network. The good news is that the solution to these
problems is available today. The combination of Dense Wave
Division Multiplexing (DWDM) and Asynchronous Transfer Mode
(ATM) solves the bandwidth and Quality of Service issues
in a cost-effective way.
DWDM makes optimum use of facilities by
allowing fiber-optic links to carry several channels simultaneously,
providing transmission capabilities four to sixteen times
those of traditional time division multiplexed (TDM) systems.
Use of DWDM allows providers to carry IP, ATM and SONET over
the optical layer. This unifying capability allows the carrier
the flexibility to gradually respond to varying customer
demands over one network. With DWDM, there is a need for
fewer network elements and fewer facility sites, thus improving
network reliability. DWDM allows bypassing of the SONET layer,
which increases effective throughput and reliability and
reduces cost.
Testing and troubleshooting of DWDM networks
demand close attention to a number of limiting performance
parameters.
The Emergence of WDM and DWDM
As WDM takes shape as the next main telecom
technology, SONET may be disappearing from many new networks
wishing to run natively over WDM. Photons can be moved from
source to destination without the need for electronic conversion
and processing. Dropping SONET framing off and putting IP
directly over raw fiber is the most efficient way. This saves
quite a bit of unnecessary overhead and a lot of money for
Telcos.
If a carrier operates both ATM and SONET
networks, the ATM signal does not have to be multiplexed
up to the SONET rate to be carried on the DWDM network. Since
the optical layer carries any type of signal without any
additional multiplexing, carriers can quickly introduce ATM
or IP without deploying an overlay network.
But DWDM is just the first step on the
road to full optical networking. The concept of an all-optical
network implies that the service provider will have optical
access to traffic at various nodes in the network, much like
the SONET layer. Optical wavelength add/drop (OWAD) offer
the capability to add or drop wavelengths to/from a fiber,
without requiring a SONET terminal. Cross-connect capability
on the optical layer provides bandwidth management flexibility.
OWAD offers flexibility and cost benefits to network providers,
but also creates as many new problems in implementation,
testing and maintenance.
Compared with repeater-based applications,
a DWDM infrastructure increases the distances between network
elements - reducing the initial network investments. The
fiber optic amplifier in a DWDM system reduces costs by amplifying
optical signals without converting them to electrical signals.
As IP grows in worldwide acceptance and
becomes a de-facto standard, telecom networks will be seeing
far more voice and data traffic over IP. But where will IP
get its structure (e.g. protection and monitoring)? - IP
over SONET, IP over ATM over SONET or IP over ATM over WDM.
All of these methods introduce overhead to the transmission.
The ultimate solution would be to take IP directly over WDM.
This will converge to the optical network, providing scalability
and cost-effectiveness. Some vendors (e.g., Ericsson) are
placing protection directly into the optical layer, but until
monitoring is available, ATM may be the glue between IP and
the native WDM transport layer.
SONET is widely deployed; well-standardized
technology and it will not vanish immediately. Existing Telcos
can run SONET over WDM, but new players can simply use WDM
only.
Running ATM over WDM
The benefits of running ATM over WDM are
great but a few issues are of concern. Channel spacing is
an important factor in DWDM systems. Different schemes are
employed to reduce the effects of four-wave mixing (FWM).
FWM occurs when equally spaced channels interact to create
new optical signals at frequencies that interfere with the
wavelength channels. Minimizing wavelength drift is absolutely
vital in DWDM and thus accurate methods of measuring wavelengths
are essential.
Optical attenuation is another fundamental
concern in DWDM. The power of the optical signal decreases
as it propagates through the fiber. Bit error ratio performance
of an optical receiver is directly related to the optical
power of the signal. With DWDM, optical power becomes a function
of how many channels are transmitted on the fiber. More channels
mean lower power per channel.
As 10 Gbps TDM becomes the standard rate
for DWDM, carriers will perform wavelength-conditioning techniques
in the DWDM system itself. One such technique is Forward
Error Correction (FEC). FEC permits a significant increase
in performance. Two basic types of FEC are utilized in networks
today. The first, in-band FEC, encodes the FEC data into
the unused portion of the SONET overhead. This provides some
system improvement, but the space in the SONET frame is limited
and thus the performance improvement is limited. The second
and more powerful type of FEC is out-of-band FEC, which slightly
increases the line rate when encoding the FEC data.
Another technique is the use of a "pilot
light" on each channel to perform all-optical channel
monitoring. By monitoring a light superimposed on each channel,
network management systems can identify faults and insure
connectivity and signal quality on each channel. This greatly
simplifies troubleshooting the network. It is similar to
the way test cells are used on specific Virtual Path/Channel
in ATM.
Testing ATM
ATM can monitor the network but testing
for ATM is a science unto itself. ATM is primarily a transport-layer
protocol. Data is sent in fixed length quantities - ATM cells.
When testing ATM one must test two important aspects - the
actual connectivity and the performance of the link. Generating
test cells (O.191) performs in-service testing. Testing connectivity
includes verifying that all the information (cells) transmitted
by user A reaches user B in the right order. This is measured
by various parameters including:
- Cell Loss and Cell Loss Ratio (CLR):
The difference between the number of transmitted and received
test cells.
- Cell Sequence Integrity: Identifies
out-of-sequence cells by comparing sequence numbers of
received and transmitted test cells.
- Cell Error and Cell Error Ratio (CER):
Received test cells with payload bit errors out of transmitted
test cells.
- Cell Misinsertion and Cell Misinsertion
Rate (CMR): Cells on one Virtual Circuit (VC) with payload
information belonging to another VC. Testing performance
includes verifying conformance to a Quality of Service
agreement by measuring these parameters:
- Minimum Cell Transfer Delay (CTD): Minimum
round-trip delay of test cells.
- Mean CTD: Average CTD.
- Jitter: The standard deviation of the
CTD.
- Peak-2-Peak Cell Delay Variation
(CDV): Difference between maximum and minimum CTD. · Peak
Cell Rate (PCR): Maximum cell rate.
- Sustainable Cell Rate (SCR): Nominal
cell transfer rate.
- Maximum Burst Size (MBS): Number of
adjacent cells that were transmitted at the PCR.
Testing ATM over WDM
Testing ATM over WDM consists of the same
concepts used for testing ATM over SONET. One must test the
connectivity and the conformance to a Quality of Service
agreement. With WDM it is more complicated because now there
are multiple parallel connections on the fiber itself. Another
dimension is added to the equation. These parallel connections
are ideally mutually exclusive but this has to be verified.
The major new requirement in testing and
monitoring of DWDM systems is the need to characterize and
measure the different parameters as a function of wavelength.
The fundamental measurements are:
- Signal-to-Noise Ratio: The best indicator
of the overall performance of the channel.
- Channel power: Optical power in each
channel. Verifies the equal distribution of power over
the bandwidth of the optical amplifiers that are used.
- Channel center wavelength and spacing:
Center wavelength of each channel. Detects drifts in the
laser sources.
- Crosstalk: The level of undesired signal
(noise plus contributions from other channels) in the passband
of the tested channel.
- Total optical power: Negative effects
of non-linear phenomena in the optical fiber depend on
the total power carried. Care must be taken because optical
power meters used today are optimized for the low power
levels associated with single channel (+6dBm). WDM systems
amplify several optical carriers simultaneously (+30dB).
Therefore a known attenuator must be used.
- Chromatic Dispersion: Variat ion of
the index of refraction of the fiber with wavelength. Needs
to be controlled throughout the optical path.
- Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD):
Various polarization states of the optical signal propagate
at different velocities. PMD affects the transmission quality
by spreading signal pulses and raising the bit error rate
(BER).
These parameters must be tested after installation
because fibers can be crushed, twisted, bent or otherwise
overstressed. Periodic testing is also a must because they
may change with time, temperature, stress, and other environmental
conditions.
Conclusions
ATM and WDM can together fulfil the ever-growing
need of the Telco industry for bandwidth. But there is a
price for using these wonderful technologies. The testing
requirements are well beyond those needed for older-generation
networks. Complex testing must be performed on-site. Especially,
the spectral dimension, once examined only by developers,
must now be considered throughout the life cycle of a network,
from planning through installation to routine maintenance
and troubleshooting.
About RADCOM
RADCOM is a leading network test equipment
manufacturer. The company specializes in the design, manufacture,
marketing and support of a line of high-quality, integrated,
multi-technology test solutions for LANs, WANs and ATM. RADCOM's
test and analysis equipment is used in the development and
manufacturing of network equipment; the installation of networks;
and the ongoing maintenance of operational networks to facilitate
real-time identification, diagnosis, isolation and resolution
of network problems.
RADCOM's sales network includes over 30
distributors in 35 countries worldwide and over 14 manufacturer's
representatives across North America. Visit RADCOM's website
at http://www.radcom.com.
About Oded Agam
Oded Agam has a BSEE
degree from The Technion in Israel and a MSEE degree from the
University of Tel-Aviv in Israel. Oded Agam is currently the
National Accounts support for RADCOM in North America. Prior
to that he was in the R&D department in RADCOM's headquarters
which is located in Israel. At that position he served as an
engineering team manager. Prior to that Oded Agam was with
the Israeli Navy as a technical officer at various positions.
Oded Agam has broad knowledge of internetworking
- ATM, Frame Relay, IP, Ethernet etc. He also has broad knowledge
of testing networks; migrating to new networks and troubleshooting
networks. Other expertise include hardware and software design
of integrated systems.
|